Skip to content Skip to footer

How to avoid unfair hiring practices in technical recruitment


The foundation for fair hiring practices in the United States was laid by landmark legislation such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Employment Opportunity Act, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. Despite these long-standing regulations, organizations today must continue to be vigilant and proactive in ensuring their recruitment processes are fair, equitable, and provide equal opportunity for all candidates, particularly in the highly competitive field hiring for technical roles.

This guide is written for talent acquisition and recruiting teams, engineering hiring managers, engineers who conduct technical interviews, and anyone else involved in the technical hiring process at their organization. From candidate sourcing, to resume screening, to final-round on-site interviews, hiring teams should be aware and informed about best practices for ensuring the hiring process is fair and equitable every step of the way.

In the sections below, we delve into the common pitfalls and unfair practices that can occur during the hiring process. We’ll explore the significant impact that unfair hiring practices can have on a workplace environment and a company’s reputation. Then, we’ll provide actionable insights and best practices on how organizations can steer clear of these practices to foster a more inclusive and equitable technical recruitment process.

Skip to a section:

How can organizations ensure equal opportunity for engineering candidates?

Ensuring fair opportunities for engineering candidates is crucial not only for the ethical values that it upholds, but also because it helps companies make the right hires efficiently. When organizations prioritize a fair and objective recruitment process, they can access a wider and more diverse pool of candidates, increasing the likelihood of finding individuals who are the right fit for the role. This, in turn, contributes to improved productivity as diverse teams are shown to bring varied perspectives that can foster innovation and problem-solving.

To reduce bias and ensure equal opportunity, organizations must take proactive steps such as implementing consistent interview questions and assessment criteria that are directly related to the job’s requirements. Tracking recruitment metrics, like candidate drop-off rate and candidate experience, can also play a key role in identifying and mitigating any potential biases in the recruitment process. By taking these steps, organizations can make strides towards creating a more equitable hiring process that not only aligns with legal and ethical standards but also contributes to the overall success of the company.

Common unfair hiring practices in technical recruitment

In the domain of technical recruitment, where hiring teams are often under pressure to fill roles quickly, some organizations might inadvertently engage in unfair hiring practices. These practices can range from subtle biases to more overt forms of discrimination, all of which hinder the diversity and ultimate success of technical teams.

Bias in technical hiring

Bias in technical hiring is a pervasive issue that can manifest in various forms, from resume reviews to live coding interviews. Unconscious biases based on a candidate’s age, gender, race, or educational background can inadvertently influence a hiring manager’s decision, often to the detriment of qualified candidates. For instance, research has shown that women and minorities are underrepresented in the tech industry, partly due to biased hiring practices. 

Additionally, reliance on employee referrals can perpetuate homogeneity, as current employees tend to refer candidates from their own networks, who are often demographically similar to themselves. It is crucial for organizations to recognize and address these biases, as they can impede diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts.

Affinity Bias: Occurs when interviewers feel a connection or similarity with a candidate based on shared interests, backgrounds, or other commonalities.

Examples of unconscious bias in hiring

Unconscious bias can often subtly influence the hiring process and affect decision-making in ways that hiring teams may not even be aware of. For example, a hiring manager might unconsciously favor candidates who attended the same university or grew up in the same region as them, due to a perceived shared connection. 

Another example of unconscious bias in hiring is the halo effect, where the positive impression a candidate makes in one area, such as a well-designed resume or strong communication skills, can overshadow potential weaknesses or red flags. These examples highlight the importance of being aware of and actively mitigating unconscious biases to ensure a fair and equitable hiring process.

Halo Effect: The tendency for an interviewer’s positive impression of one aspect of a candidate to influence their overall perception of the candidate.

Illegal hiring practices

Illegal hiring practices encompass any form of workplace discrimination that unfairly affects a candidate’s chances of employment based on their age, gender, race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or other protected status. For instance, it is unlawful to inquire about a candidate’s age or plans for starting a family during the interview process, as these questions can be used to discriminate against older applicants or women of childbearing age. 

Another example of an illegal hiring practice is the refusal to provide reasonable accommodations for candidates with disabilities during the hiring process. These types of discriminatory practices not only violate federal and state laws, but they can also have severe consequences for a company’s reputation and financial standing. It is essential for organizations to train their recruiting teams and hiring managers to recognize and prevent these illegal practices to foster a diverse and inclusive workplace.

Ageism: A type of unconscious bias where interviewers favor candidates of a certain age group, which results in discriminating against older or younger candidates.

Understanding the impact of unfair hiring practices on the workplace environment and company reputation

Unfair hiring practices can have a profound impact on the workplace environment, affecting everything from team dynamics to employee morale to productivity. When current employees perceive that the hiring process is biased or unjust, it can lead to feelings of resentment and frustration, ultimately resulting in higher employee turnover. This loss of talent can be detrimental to an organization’s long-term success, as it both diminishes the company’s productivity in the short-term and increases the costs associated with recruiting and training new employees.

Plus, with the widespread use of employer review sites like Glassdoor, workplace reputation is more visible and influential than ever before. Unfair hiring practices can quickly tarnish an organization’s employer branding, leading to a negative company reputation that can deter top talent from applying to open positions. In contrast, a positive and fair recruitment process can enhance a company’s reputation, making it an employer of choice for prospective candidates. By prioritizing objective and equitable hiring practices, organizations can ensure that they are attracting the best talent, fostering a positive workplace environment, and safeguarding their reputation in the long run.

Contrast Effect: Occurs when a candidate is evaluated in comparison to other candidates, rather than on their own qualifications.

How to avoid unfair hiring practices in technical recruitment

Ensuring a fair and objective hiring process is crucial in the competitive field of technical recruitment. In this section, we will explore practical strategies and best practices that organizations can employ to avoid unfair hiring practices and create a more equitable recruitment process for engineering candidates.

Promoting an inclusive technical hiring process

Promoting an inclusive technical hiring process begins with a carefully crafted job description that clearly outlines the responsibilities and qualifications required for the role, avoiding any language that could be construed as discriminatory. The hiring criteria should be strictly based on the skills and experiences that are necessary for the job, ensuring that each candidate is evaluated based on their professional merits. By standardizing the hiring process and clearly defining the job description and hiring criteria, organizations can significantly reduce biases and foster a more inclusive and equitable recruitment environment for technical roles.

Effective strategies to minimize hiring biases

One effective strategy to minimize hiring biases is to implement structured interviews instead of relying on unstructured interviews. Structured interviews involve asking each candidate the same set of predetermined questions, which can help to ensure that the evaluation is based on the candidate’s responses rather than the interviewer’s personal biases. This method is particularly useful in reducing biases that can arise from the subjectivity of unstructured interviews, where the questions can vary from candidate to candidate, often influenced by the interviewer’s perceptions and assumptions.

Another important strategy is to focus on the candidate’s skills and abilities rather than their resumes. This can be achieved through the use of technical assessments and coding tests, which provide an objective measure of the candidate’s competencies. In addition, organizations should invest in interviewer training to educate hiring managers and interviewers about the potential biases that can affect their decision-making process. By combining structured interviews, skills-based assessments, and comprehensive interviewer training, organizations can take significant steps towards minimizing biases when hiring engineers.

Confirmation Bias: Occurs when interviewers seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs or expectations about a candidate.

AI and bias in the hiring process

Recruiting teams are increasingly harnessing the power of AI-powered tools to expedite manual processes such as resume review and interview scheduling, enhancing efficiency and allowing for more informed decision-making. However, there is the risk of bias built into AI, as these tools are programmed and learn from existing data, which may already contain biased information. For example, if an AI tool is trained on resumes from predominantly male candidates, it may inadvertently favor male candidates in the screening process. 

To mitigate these risks, it is essential to regularly audit and test AI tools for bias, ensuring that they are not perpetuating discriminatory practices. Additionally, organizations must be transparent about their use of AI in the hiring process and continually update and refine their algorithms to minimize bias and uphold the principles of fairness and objectivity.

Methods for mitigating unconscious bias in the hiring process

Beyond using objective technical assessments, structured interviews, and careful use of AI tools, another method for mitigating unconscious bias in the hiring process is to strive to make hiring panels diverse. When individuals from varied educational, racial, and socioeconomic backgrounds are involved in the decision-making process, it can help to balance out individual biases and lead to a more objective evaluation of candidates. In addition, diverse panels can provide valuable insights into the unique qualities and experiences that different candidates bring to the table, ultimately leading to more informed hiring decisions.

Additionally, companies may choose to employ blind recruitment practices to reduce unconscious bias. This involves anonymizing certain candidate information, such as names, photos, and educational backgrounds, to prevent biases related to gender, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status from influencing the hiring decision. By focusing solely on the candidate’s skills, experiences, and fit for the role, organizations can create a more level playing field and ensure that talent is the primary determinant of hiring success. This method has been proven effective in various industries and is an excellent way to foster DEI in the workplace.

How can standardization contribute to fairness in technical hiring?

Standardization is a key component in ensuring fairness during the technical hiring process, as it minimizes subjective biases and provides a consistent framework for evaluating all candidates. One way to achieve this is by incorporating validated technical assessments that are directly related to the job’s requirements. These assessments can be administered to a large volume of candidates, allowing organizations to fairly and efficiently evaluate technical skills at scale. By establishing quantifiable and consistent criteria for moving candidates to the next recruiting stage, organizations can ensure that each candidate is given the same opportunity to showcase their skills.

Final thoughts

Whether you’re hiring one engineer or one hundred, it is imperative to recognize and actively mitigate unfair hiring practices in your organization’s technical recruitment. By employing strategies such as structured interviews, technical assessments, and diverse hiring panels, companies can significantly reduce biases and foster a more equitable hiring process. The implementation of AI-powered tools, when carefully audited for biases, can also contribute to a more efficient and less biased recruitment process. Standardization, through validated technical assessments, ensures fairness at scale and provides equitable opportunities for all candidates to showcase their skills.

CodeSignal is the leading technical interview and assessment platform that helps hiring teams make the right hires, faster, while increasing the diversity of their engineering teams. We do this through our fair and predictive Certified Evaluations—role-relevant assessments that are written and maintained by subject matter experts and validated by our team of Industrial-Organizational (IO) Psychologists—as well as features like interview templates that make it fast and easy for teams to conduct consistent and structured interviews. 

Want to learn more about how you can drive fair hiring practices to ensure compliance and increase diversity on your technical teams? Schedule a call with a CodeSignal expert today.