Hiring technical talent today is a bit like debugging a complex line of code. The right tools make all the difference, but the wrong ones are bound to slow you down.
Recent feedback shows that DevSkiller isn’t always the best fit for technical hiring teams when it comes to candidate experience, test clarity, or flexibility. If your assessments feel clunky, outdated, or frustrating, we’re here to help.
In this guide, we’ve compiled the top DevSkiller alternatives based on what hiring managers, recruiters, and candidates are saying in 2025. Whether you’re focused on giving candidates a better experience or looking for a scalable, data-driven solution, it’s time for a fresh way to assess real technical skills.
DevSkiller alternatives for modern technical skills assessment
Navigating the myriad of options can be challenging, so here are the best DevSkiller alternatives, each excelling in different areas:
Why look for DevSkiller alternatives?
According to recent user reviews and recruiter feedback, many hiring teams turn to DevSkiller alternatives due to issues with candidate experience and test quality. Common complaints include a clunky interface, confusing test instructions, and technical glitches that distract candidates from showing their best work. Some users say the questions feel outdated or poorly designed, and that the assessments might be overwhelming.
On the employer side, feedback points to rigid pricing, limited customization, and integration gaps with tools like ATS systems. While DevSkiller’s support team gets high marks, some teams still wish the platform was easier to configure and use. These challenges are pushing more recruiters to explore platforms that offer a smoother experience, clearer assessments, and a more flexible setup for both hiring teams and candidates.
🚀 Going the extra mile: How can I make the technical assessments better for job applicants?
When evaluating coding skills or using a pre-employment assessment platform, keep exercises relevant. Be respectful of candidates’ time, and choose a tool with a user-friendly interface so that candidates can log on and jump into hiring activities right away.
Choose platforms that offer realistic coding exercises and problem solving skills tied to the role’s actual tech skills. Clear instructions, flexible testing windows, and a smooth user experience go a long way in keeping job applicants engaged and leaving a positive impression of your brand.
CodeSignal (Best all-around, user-friendly, AI-native assessments)
CodeSignal’s powerful platform offers Certified Assessments and a highly practical approach to evaluating coding and developer skills in potential candidates. CodeSignal uses job-relevant simulations to quickly identify top talent and reduce bias throughout the hiring cycle. Beyond technical and developer roles, CodeSignal supports behavioral, soft skills, and business role assessments.
Winning features for smarter hiring decisions
- Support for modern, scalable hiring process: Whether screening hundreds or thousands, CodeSignal enables recruiters to access consistent, data-driven evaluations without sacrificing accuracy or candidate engagement.
- Real-world simulations: CodeSignal offers hands-on coding environments that mirror actual job tasks, helping recruiters assess true developer readiness and performance.
- Advanced proctoring and integrity tools: Built-in plagiarism detection and solution review ensure assessment results are fair and predictive of a candidate’s readiness for the next hiring step.
- Seamless applicant tracking system (ATS) integration capabilities: Easily sync CodeSignal with top applicant tracking systems (like Greenhouse and Workday) to streamline candidate workflows and reduce manual recruiting tasks.
- Advanced analytics and benchmarking: CodeSignal’s unique approach to Certified Assessments allows you to benchmark your talent pool and overall process against the broader industry, helping you understand the quality and efficiency of your funnel.
Codility
Codility offers a variety of skills gaps testing and candidate assessment. However, users often mention that the interface can be difficult to navigate, which may impact the experience for both recruiters and candidates. The platform emphasizes code efficiency and problem-solving, making it suitable for evaluating core programming skills.
Perks
- Library of coding challenges
- Support for various programming languages
- Custom coding tasks tailored for specific needs
Downsides
- Clunky UI and rigid tests can frustrate candidates
- Test content may not reflect team skills needs
- Pricing and limited integrations can slow hiring workflows
CoderPad
CoderPad supports live coding interviews in a collaborative environment, allowing interviewers to observe candidates as they work through problems. It offers playback and supports multiple languages. However, because the focus is on live interviews, users may find fewer built-in assessments for pre-screening candidates.
Perks
- Real-time collaboration during interviews
- Low cost starter pricing on a unified platform
Downsides
- Lack of pre-built test libraries
- More limited compared to a full, comprehensive IDE
CodeSubmit
CodeSubmit focuses on project-based assessments, offering take-home challenges to mirror realistic tasks. Candidates complete assignments using their own tools and environment, making the experience reflective of day-to-day work, but which also introduces privacy and security challenges.
The platform encourages a Test-Driven Development (TDD) approach, allowing candidates to validate their code against predefined tests. While especially useful for developers, it can also be used for data science roles.
Perks
- Natural candidate experience with personal tools
- Test-Driven Development (TDD) approach
Downsides
- Limited live interview features, mainly focused on take-home tasks
- Smaller library of pre-built assessments with manual setup required
- Basic anti-cheating tools compared to other platforms
HackerEarth
HackerEarth offers recruitment process assessments across technical and soft skills, with support for multiple programming languages. It includes anti-cheating features to maintain test integrity. While the platform is versatile, some users find the interface complex to navigate.
Perks
- Range of both technical assessments
- Anti-cheating features in place for a fair and secure environment
Downsides
- Complex navigation may feel overwhelming for new users
- Steeper learning curve for both recruiters and candidates
- Soft skills assessments are multiple-choice rather than realistic job simulations
TestGorilla
TestGorilla offers validated tests to cover soft skills, technical skills, and cultural fit. The platform includes features like randomized questions, timed assessments, and peer reviews to support fair, reliable results. Multilingual support helps teams assess candidates across diverse backgrounds. While it offers wide coverage, some users may find the focus less technical compared to other coding-specific platforms.
Perks
- Fair testing conditions to minimize cheating
- Peer review feature for enhanced reliability
- Multilingual support
- Verification of results for added confidence
Downsides
- Limited support for technical or coding-specific assessments
- Some users find test customization options restrictive
- Results can lack depth for highly specialized roles
HackerRank
HackerRank is an assessment platform used for screening and interviewing developers. It offers coding challenges designed to measure problem-solving ability and programming fundamentals. The platform is commonly used by large organizations but may not suit teams looking for more customizable or practical assessments.
Perks
- Branded skills strategy for organization-specific goals and tests
- Library of pre-built coding questions
- Tools for live coding and pair programming
- Includes reporting and benchmarking features
Downsides
- Tests may feel academic or rigid for some roles
- Candidate experience can be affected by UI complexity
- May require customization to match real-world scenarios
- Features and pricing may not align with smaller teams’ needs
| Platform | Best for | Top features | User Rating (G2/Capterra) | Free Trial? |
| CodeSignal | Best all-around, standardized coding assessments and interview practice | – Pre-screen candidates at scale- Live technical interviews with a built-in IDE- Research-backed Certified Assessments for objective hiring- Behavioral & work styles assessment- Interview prep courses for candidates- AI tools for cheating detection & AI coding evaluation | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4.7/5) | ✅ Yes |
| Codility | Large-scale hiring and coding events | – Designed for high-volume recruitment events- Branding options for a seamless candidate experience- Anti-AI detection tools- Structured technical interviews for consistency | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4.6/5) | ❌ No |
| CoderPad | Live, interactive coding interviews | – Collaborative IDE with REPL & SLP- Supports multiple programming languages- AI assist feature for candidates- Webcam proctoring for assessment integrity | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4.5/5) | ✅ Yes |
| CodeSubmit | Realistic take-home challenges and coding interviews | – Natural candidate experience with personal tools- Test-Driven Development (TDD) approach | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4.9/5) | ✅ Yes |
| HackerEarth | Talent engagement with soft and technical skills assessment | – AI-powered candidate matching and hiring challenges- Talent benchmarks and structured video interviews | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4.5/5) | ✅ Yes |
| TestGorilla | Predictive hiring insights across multiple skills | – Predictive performance metrics to identify top talent- Coding tests available in 12+ programming languages- Broad skill assessments beyond technical roles | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4.5/5) | ✅ Yes |
| HackerRank | Large teams hiring developers with strong CS fundamentals | – Library of pre-built coding questions- Tools for live coding and pair programming- Includes reporting and benchmarking features | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4.7/5) | ✅ Yes |
How to choose the best technical assessment platform
Choosing the right technical assessment platform is about finding the one that actually works for your team and your candidates. From real-world coding exercises to seamless user experiences, here’s what to keep in mind as you narrow down your options:
- Know what you need to test: Are you hiring engineers, data scientists, or QA testers? Some platforms specialize in take-home projects, others in real-time coding and live interviews to judge a candidate’s ability on screen. Start with the roles you’re hiring for, then match the platform.
- Make sure it’s easy to use: If it’s clunky for candidates or confusing for your team, it’s a no-go. A clean, intuitive interface makes everyone’s life easier. Easy interview scheduling within an applicant tracking system can make the entire hiring process smoother.
- Look for solid anti-cheating tools: Features like IP logging, copy/paste blocking, and webcam proctoring can help ensure test results are legit. Consider question leaks, particularly for multiple choice questions that might exist outside of the platform.
- Don’t forget the price tag: Check if the pricing fits your hiring volume and team size. Some platforms look great—until you factor in additional costs for more than one user or extra features.
- Test it yourself: Most platforms offer demos or limited time trials. Try it out and see if it works for your team before committing.
Make the right call now, and both your candidates and your hiring team will feel the difference in your future hiring process.
Transform your technical assessment with CodeSignal
The right assessment platform can be the difference between a slow hiring process and a standout new hire. Only CodeSignal combines real-world skill validation, a smooth candidate experience for both assessments and interviews, and powerful anti-cheating tech—all in one platform.
If you’re looking for a more scalable, data-driven, and developer-friendly way to evaluate top talent, it’s time to signal a smarter choice.
Try CodeSignal today and see the difference for yourself.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I choose the right platform for my needs?
To choose the right platform, evaluate your assessment needs, prioritize user-friendliness, consider anti-cheating measures, and assess cost-effectiveness. This will ensure the platform aligns with your specific requirements.
What are the key features to look for in a technical assessment platform?
Key features to prioritize in a skill assessment platform include proven job-relevant assessments, support for multiple programming languages, real-time collaboration capabilities, and strong anti-cheating measures. These attributes ensure an effective evaluation of candidates’ skills and integrity.
How important are anti-cheating measures in these platforms?
Anti-cheating tools help keep skill assessments fair and accurate. Without them, it’s hard to know if a candidate’s results truly reflect their abilities.
Can these platforms be used for non-developer roles?
Yes! While many platforms focus on coding exercises for developers, several (like CodeSignal) also offer assessments for broader tech skills and even soft skills. This makes them useful for evaluating a variety of job applicants, including sales, support, and other go-to-market (GTM) roles.