You’ve got roles to fill, engineers to hire, and a queue of candidates waiting—but HackerEarth might not be cutting it.
Whether it’s clunky workflows, generic tests, or feedback from frustrated candidates, when the cracks in your assessment workflow start to show, it’s time to make a change.
Are you ready for a better solution? This guide breaks down the top HackerEarth alternatives, from role-specific assessments to developer-friendly user design. We’ll also explain how CodeSignal—a platform built for scale, real-world skill evaluation, and proven candidate experience—is your top option for modern hiring.
Why look for HackerEarth alternatives?
While HackerEarth might work well for a time, teams often look for alternatives that better align with their hiring workflows and candidate experience goals. If you’ve run into any of the challenges below, it might be time to explore other options:
- Candidate drop-off caused by a clunky or outdated user interface
- Limited options for role-specific assessments
- Narrow focus on technical skills, with little support for evaluating soft skills or broader competencies
- Platform reliability issues, including glitches or slow load times that disrupt testing
- Inconsistent support, making onboarding or troubleshooting difficult for busy teams
🗣️ Finding a platform that solves these pain points can mean faster hiring, better candidate experiences, and more confident hiring decisions.
Top HackerEarth alternatives
The options below offer a range of features (from validated assessments, advanced integrated development environments, and integration capabilities), to help you assess developer skills with accuracy and efficiency.
1. CodeSignal
CodeSignal is an industry-leading platform known for realistic coding assessments and data-driven skills insights. Assess, interview, and hire all-star tech talent with Certified Assessments that are backed and designed by IO Psychologists. CodeSignal is designed to scale with enterprise-level hiring while delivering an intuitive, candidate-friendly experience.
Key features
- Certified Assessments that simulate and more accurately measure candidates’ job-relevant skills, without overburdening your hiring team
- Market-leading AI features, ranging from scoring insights to AI-assisted coding
- Unique Assessment Score benchmarking across industry standards
- Advanced analytics for better data on hiring performance, engagement, and testing
- Built-in plagiarism protection with online proctoring, ID verification, copy/paste detection, and multilayer checks to ensure identity and integrity
- Scalable skills assessment and technical interview solutions for high-volume hiring
- Seamless integration with major ATS and people management platforms
Best for: Enterprises and fast-scaling teams that need in-depth data insights and developer assessments modeled on real work.
Hello, successful + streamlined technical hiring
See how Instacart automated its comprehensive technical recruiting process with CodeSignal.
2. Codility
Codility is a testing platform that offers straightforward coding assessments for testing problem-solving skills in a controlled environment. It’s a mature platform that works well for companies with remote tech hiring needs.
Key features
- AI-assisted candidate screening
- Code playback and evaluation tools
- Anti-cheating measures
- Built-in analytics and reporting
Best for: Organizations looking for a simple platform to test core technical skills efficiently.
Potential limitations
- Some users report that test setup is more time-consuming than expected.
- The platform has limited question diversity (especially for niche or advanced engineering roles) when compared to other options.
3. CoderPad
CoderPad specializes in live coding interviews, making it easy for hiring managers and candidates to collaborate in real time. This option is ideal for evaluating a candidate’s thought process and communication under pressure.
Key features
- Real-time collaborative coding interface
- Supports 30+ programming languages
- Live whiteboarding and pair programming tools
- Playback and replay features
Best for: Teams prioritizing live technical interviews and collaborative assessments over pre-screened tests.
Potential limitations
- Limited support for collaborative debugging or live problem-solving can restrict interactive interviews.
- Some users say that the platform is too basic for simulating realistic, in-depth engineering challenges.
4. TestGorilla
TestGorilla offers multiple skills assessments, including soft skills and language assessments. This makes it suitable for non-technical roles across industries. It’s a flexible platform for evaluating more than just coding skills.
Key features
- 300+ test options across hard and soft skills
- Personality and language tests
- Anti-cheating and time-tracking tools
- Integration with popular HR tools
Best for: Companies hiring across a wide variety of roles, especially outside of pure software development.
Potential limitations
- Automated scoring could misjudge open-ended answers, creating more hassles in the candidate evaluation process.
- Higher-tier pricing is steep for small companies needing only occasional assessments.
5. CodeSubmit
CodeSubmit specializes in take-home coding assignments that mirror real development work. It gives candidates the freedom to work in their own environment and allows hiring teams to assess code quality, problem-solving, and practical skills in a more authentic way.
Key features
- Take-home assignments to mimic real developer tasks
- Custom branding for assessments
- Code playback and version control integration
- Minimal setup and user-friendly UI
Best for: Startups and teams that focus on candidate experience and real-world coding tasks over automation or scalability.
Potential limitations
- Requires sending a new invite for every test attempt, which could clutter a candidate’s dashboard.
- Limited test environments options when compared to alternatives.
6. DevSkiller
DevSkiller uses project-based assessments to help teams evaluate technical skills using a data-centric process. The platform also supports technical interviewing, skills management, and employee reskilling or upskilling.
Key features
- RealLifeTesting™ for hands-on, role-based challenges
- Integration with ATS platforms
- Skill mapping and reporting tools
- Global candidate support
Best for: Mid-market hiring teams that have a focus on hiring developers, or those teams wanting to upgrade from manual assessment processes.
Potential limitations
- Clunky interface and technical glitches can distract candidates from showing their best work.
- Some users say the questions feel outdated or poorly designed.
<< Check out our guide to DevSkiller alternatives >>
7. HackerRank
HackerRank provides several options for coding challenges and live interview tools. It’s often used to assess developers across multiple domains and competencies.
Key features
- Library of coding challenges and technical questions
- Role-based assessments for data science, DevOps, and more
- AI-powered plagiarism detection
- Collaboration-friendly for technical panels
Best for: Large enterprises that want standardized, algorithm-focused assessments to screen high volumes of technical candidates.
Potential limitations
- Some assessment questions are reused or have the potential to be leaked online, reducing effectiveness in screening.
- The platform emphasizes algorithmic questions over real-world job task simulations.
8. Qualified
Qualified is a skills assessment tool designed for project-based coding tasks. Each task or test closely mimics real-world development scenarios.
Key features
- Custom coding content and challenges to match your tech needs
- Code playback for performance review
- Detailed performance scoring and reporting
- Ability to evaluate long-form technical thinking
- Project-based assessments modeled after GitHub-style workflows
Best for: Engineering teams that are ready to devote time and effort to a more customizable testing process, or those that have a complex hiring pipeline.
Potential limitations
- Initial onboarding takes time, and some users find that the UI lacks important features.
- More limited native integrations with ATS platforms compared to newer competitors.
Choosing the right solution for your team
If your current technical assessment platform feels too rigid, outdated, or disconnected from how developers actually work—we hear you.
As hiring expectations evolve, more teams are looking for tools that offer flexibility, scalability, and a better candidate experience, all without sacrificing reliability.
CodeSignal leads the way by delivering real-world coding challenges, proven and secure assessments, live technical interviewing, and seamless integrations that support efficient, modern hiring. It’s built for teams that need more than just a test. When you need deep skill insights, speed, and confidence in every hire, you know exactly where to look.
It’s time to see what’s possible. Try CodeSignal today, and start hiring smarter.
Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
1. How can you accurately measure candidate strength without custom tests?
Many platforms offer standardized coding tests that are benchmarked against industry data, helping you evaluate candidates on a consistent scale. Look for tools like CodeSignal’s Certified Assessments and reduce risk of question leaks—without building custom tests from scratch.
2. What’s the most effective way to use platforms to test soft skills?
Platforms like CodeSignal include advanced, AI-powered assessments for communication, problem-solving, emotional intelligence, and other soft skills. Pair these with role-specific tasks or situational judgment tests to get a well-rounded view of how a candidate might work on a team or handle real-world challenges.
3. How can technical assessment platforms help with remote hiring?
These platforms streamline remote hiring by offering browser-based coding environments, automated grading, and video interview tools—all in one place. They allow you to screen, test, and interview candidates globally without sacrificing consistency, speed, or fairness.