Visualizing Sentence Embeddings with t-SNE
Introduction
Welcome to the third lesson in our course on Text Representation Techniques for RAG systems! In our previous lesson, we explored how to generate sentence embeddings and saw how these richer representations capture semantic meaning better than the classic Bag-of-Words.
Now, we will build on that knowledge to visualize these embeddings in a two-dimensional space using t-SNE (t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding). By the end of this lesson, you'll have an interactive way to see how thematically similar sentences group closer together, reinforcing the idea that embeddings preserve meaningful relationships between sentences.
Understanding t-SNE
t-SNE helps us visualize high-dimensional embeddings by compressing them into a given lower-dimensional space (usually 2D or 3D, for visualization) while preserving relative similarities:
- Similarity First: t-SNE prioritizes keeping similar sentences close. It calculates pairwise similarities in the original space (using a probability distribution) so nearby embeddings get higher similarity scores than distant ones.
- Local Structure: It preserves neighborhoods of related points rather than exact distances. This means clusters you see reflect genuine thematic groupings (e.g., NLP vs. Food), but axis values themselves have no intrinsic meaning.
- Perplexity Matters: This parameter (~5–50) controls neighborhood size. Lower values emphasize tight clusters (good for spotting subtopics), while higher values show broader trends (useful for separating major categories).
- Tradeoffs: While powerful for visualization, t-SNE is computationally expensive for large datasets (as it compares all sentence pairs). For RAG systems, this makes it better suited for exploratory analysis of smaller samples than production-scale data.
You may be asking yourself, why does this matter for RAG? Seeing embeddings cluster by topic validates they're capturing semantic relationships – a prerequisite for effective retrieval. If NLP sentences scattered randomly, we'd question the embedding quality before even building the RAG pipeline, prompting us to reevaluate the choice of the embedding model.
Building Our Data
We’ll construct a dataset of 32 sentences, divided evenly among four topics: NLP, ML, Food, and Weather. We’ll also assign each sentence a category label so that we can color and shape each point on our final plot.
This function outputs two parallel vectors: one with sentences and one with their associated category. These categories will later control the color and shape used for plotting.

