Using Index Notation

Using Index Notation | CodeSignal Learn

Introduction

2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 3

Why a Shorter Notation Helps

72

What Index Notation Looks Like

\underbrace{2 \times 2 \times 2}_{\text{3 copies of 2}} \times \underbrace{3 \times 3}_{\text{2 copies of 3}} = 2^3 \times 3^2

Converting from Expanded Form to Index Form

360

Converting More Factorisations

48

Reading Index Form Back to a Number

2^4 \times 3 \times 7^2

Common Pitfalls

2^3

Conclusion and Next Steps

In this lesson, we completed our prime factorisation journey by learning index notation, a compact way to express repeated prime factors using a base and an exponent. We practised converting expanded factorisations into index form by counting identical primes and writing each group as a power, and we worked in reverse — expanding index-form expressions back into products to recover the original number. Combined with factor trees and repeated division from our earlier lessons, you now have a complete toolkit for breaking any composite number into primes and presenting the result clearly. Time to put it all into practice! The exercises ahead will have you matching expanded and index forms, filling in missing bases and exponents, writing full factorisations in index notation from scratch, and computing products from index expressions. This is a great way to cement everything and finish the course on a strong note — let's go!

Previous Lesson

Join the 1M+ learners on CodeSignal

Be a part of our community of 1M+ users who develop and demonstrate their skills on CodeSignal

Welcome back to Breaking Numbers Into Primes! This is our fourth and final lesson in the course, so we are about to cross the finish line together. Over the past three lessons, we learned what prime factorisation means, built factor trees to split numbers into primes visually, and used repeated division to peel off prime factors one at a time in a tidy column. Every one of those techniques left us with a product of primes written out in full — for instance, $2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 3$ for $72$ . Today, we learn a cleaner way to write that result using index notation (also called exponent notation), and we will practise moving back and forth between the two forms with ease.

Writing out every single prime factor is perfectly correct, but it can get long. For a number like $72$ , listing $2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 3$ is manageable. But imagine a number whose factorisation contains six $2$ s, three $3$ s, and two $5$ s — writing all eleven factors in a row becomes tedious and hard to read at a glance.

Index notation solves this by grouping identical primes together and using a small raised number to say how many times each prime appears. It is like switching from spelling out "two, two, two, two, two, two" to simply saying "six twos." The meaning is identical; only the packaging is more compact.

You have likely seen this shorthand in other contexts already. Scientists write $10^6$ instead of $1{,}000{,}000$ , and computer engineers describe memory sizes using powers of $2$ like $2^{10} = 1{,}024$ . The same idea applies here: whenever a factor repeats, an exponent keeps our work tidy and readable.

In index notation, each group of repeated prime factors is written as a base raised to an exponent (also called an index or power). The base is the prime itself, and the exponent tells us how many times that prime is multiplied by itself.

\underbrace{2 \times 2 \times 2}_{\text{3 copies of 2}} \times \underbrace{3 \times 3}_{\text{2 copies of 3}} = 2^3 \times 3^2

Labeled diagram showing the base and exponent parts of 2³ × 3² with expansions below each term

Here, $2^3$ means "multiply $2$ by itself $3$ times" and $3^2$ means "multiply $3$ by itself $2$ times." A few vocabulary points worth noting:

In $2^3$ , the number $2$ is the base and $3$ is the exponent. We read it as "two to the power of three" or "two cubed."
In $3^2$ , the base is $3$ and the exponent is $2$ . We read it as "three to the power of two" or "three squared."
If a prime appears only once, we can write it with an exponent of $1$ (like $5^1$ ) or simply write the prime on its own (like $5$ ). Omitting the $1$ is the standard convention because it keeps things tidy.

Turning an expanded factorisation into index notation takes just two steps. Let's walk through them with $360$ .

From our earlier work with repeated division, $360$ factorises as:

360 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 3 \times 5

Step 1 — Count each prime. Group the identical primes and tally them up.

Prime	How many times?
$2$	$3$
$3$	$2$
$5$	$1$

Flow diagram showing color-coded grouping of repeated prime factors in 2×2×2×3×3×5 converting to 2³×3²×5

Step 2 — Write base and exponent. Replace each group with the prime raised to its count.

360 = 2^3 \times 3^2 \times 5

That's it. The primes should be listed in ascending order, which happens naturally when we use factor trees or repeated division because those methods already produce factors from smallest to largest.

Let's practise the conversion with a few more numbers so the process becomes automatic.

Example 1: $48$

Using repeated division or a factor tree, we find $48 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3$ . There are four $2$ s and one $3$ , so:

48 = 2^4 \times 3

Example 2: $450$

The expanded factorisation is $450 = 2 \times 3 \times 3 \times 5 \times 5$ . One $2$ , two $3$ s, and two $5$ s, giving us:

450 = 2 \times 3^2 \times 5^2

Example 3: $1{,}176$

Working through repeated division yields $1{,}176 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 3 \times 7 \times 7$ . Three $2$ s, one $3$ , and two $7$ s:

1{,}176 = 2^3 \times 3 \times 7^2

Notice how much quicker the index form is to scan, especially as numbers grow larger. At a glance, you can see exactly which primes are involved and how many times each one appears.

Converting in the other direction is equally important. Given an expression like $2^4 \times 3 \times 7^2$ , we need to expand each power and then multiply everything together to recover the original number.

Let's work this one out step by step.

$2^4 = 2 \times 2 \times 2 \times 2 = 16$
$3 = 3$
$7^2 = 7 \times 7 = 49$

Now multiply the results: $16 \times 3 = 48$ , then $48 \times 49 = 2{,}352$ .

2^4 \times 3 \times 7^2 = 2{,}352

This skill doubles as a verification tool. Whenever you write a factorisation in index form, expand it and multiply back — if you land on the original number, you know every base and exponent is correct.

A few small mistakes come up often when learners first work with index notation. Keeping them in mind will save you time and frustration.

Three-panel illustration of common index notation mistakes with correct and incorrect examples side by side

Swapping the base and the exponent. In $2^3$ , the base ( $2$ ) is what gets multiplied, and the exponent ( $3$ ) tells how many times. Writing $3^2$ instead of $2^3$ gives a completely different value ( $9$ versus $8$ ).
Dropping a prime that appears once. If $5$ shows up in the factorisation, it must still appear in the index form even without a written exponent. Leaving it out changes the product entirely.
Multiplying the base by the exponent. A common slip is reading $2^3$ as $2 \times 3 = 6$ instead of $2 \times 2 \times 2 = 8$ . Remember, the exponent tells you the number of copies, not an extra factor to multiply by.