Introduction to Token Blacklisting and Forced Revocation

Welcome to the Blacklisting and Forced Revocation in TypeScript REST API. In this lesson, we will focus on token blacklisting and forced revocation, two critical techniques for maintaining the security of your API.

What is Token Blacklisting?

Token blacklisting is a security mechanism where you maintain a list of tokens that are no longer considered valid, despite not being expired. When a token is added to this blacklist, the system will reject it even if it contains a valid signature and hasn't reached its expiration date.

What is Forced Revocation?

Forced revocation is the act of deliberately invalidating a token before its natural expiration. This is typically done through blacklisting and is essential for scenarios where you need to immediately terminate a user's session.

Approaches to Token Invalidation

There are several approaches to invalidating tokens:

  1. Blacklisting - Adding tokens to a "deny list" that is checked during validation
  2. Token Removal - Simply removing tokens from the database if you're storing them
  3. Direct Invalidation - Setting a "valid" flag to false in your token storage

Each approach has its trade-offs. Token removal is simple but only works if you store tokens in the first place. Direct invalidation requires modifying your token storage schema. Blacklisting works universally but requires an additional database structure.

For this course, we'll focus on the blacklisting approach as it provides a robust solution that works well with JWT-based authentication without requiring us to store valid tokens.

When to Use These Techniques

These techniques are particularly useful in several scenarios:

  • When a user logs out and you want to invalidate their token immediately
  • When a security breach is detected and you need to invalidate potentially compromised tokens
  • When a user's account is deactivated or suspended
  • When you need to enforce access policy changes immediately
Advantages and Disadvantages of Token Invalidation

Pros:

  • Provides immediate security response capabilities
  • Allows for centralized security control
  • Creates an audit trail of revocation events
  • Enhances user account security

Cons:

  • Introduces database dependency for token validation
  • Adds latency to request processing
  • Requires storage and management of blacklisted tokens
  • Creates potential performance bottlenecks at scale
Understanding the TokenBlacklist Model

The TokenBlacklist model is the foundation of our implementation. It stores invalidated tokens and provides a way to check if a token has been revoked.

Key Concepts:

  • We store the complete token as a unique identifier, allowing quick lookups
  • We include a reason field to track why a token was blacklisted (useful for auditing)
  • The expiresAt field is critical for database maintenance - it matches the token's expiration so we can eventually clean up the blacklist

This model is optimized for quick lookups, which is essential as every authenticated request will check against this table.

Implementing Token Revocation Logic

The revokeAccessToken function handles the core functionality of adding tokens to the blacklist:

Key Logic:

  • The function decodes (not verifies) the token to extract its expiration time
  • We determine when the blacklist entry should expire based on the token's own expiration
  • If we can't determine the token's expiration, we default to 24 hours from now
  • We store the token information with a reason to create an audit trail

This approach ensures that the blacklist grows and shrinks naturally with token lifetimes, preventing it from becoming too large over time.

Middleware for Token Validation and Blacklist Checking

The authentication middleware is where token validation and blacklist checking come together:

Core Functionality:

  • Before verifying the token itself, we check if it exists in the blacklist
  • If the token is blacklisted, we immediately reject the request with a 403 status
  • The order of operations is important: we check the blacklist first, then verify the token
  • We include the revocation reason in the response to provide context to clients

This middleware creates a decision point where blacklisted tokens are filtered out before any protected resources are accessed.

Admin Endpoint for Token Revocation

To provide administrative control, we implement a dedicated endpoint for token revocation:

Essential Logic:

  • We implement proper authorization checks to ensure only admins can revoke tokens
  • The endpoint handles multiple admin role formats for flexibility
  • The endpoint requires both the token to revoke and optionally a reason
  • We use the revokeAccessToken function to add the token to the blacklist
  • For security, we only return a partial token in the response

This admin-controlled revocation creates a powerful security tool that can be used in response to security events or as part of normal administrative operations.

Summary and Preparation for Practice

In this lesson, we've explored token blacklisting and forced revocation in depth. We've seen how these techniques provide critical security controls for your API by allowing you to invalidate tokens before their natural expiration.

The implementation we've covered creates a robust framework for token security that balances:

  • Security requirements (immediate revocation)
  • Performance considerations (optimized lookups)
  • Database management (automatic cleanup via expiration)

Congratulations on reaching the end of the course! You've gained valuable skills in securing your REST API with TypeScript. Now, it's time to apply what you've learned in the practice exercises. These exercises will reinforce your understanding and help you master the techniques covered in this course.

Sign up
Join the 1M+ learners on CodeSignal
Be a part of our community of 1M+ users who develop and demonstrate their skills on CodeSignal