Greetings, and welcome to the exciting lesson on Comparing Different Optimizers for Autoencoders! In prior lessons, we've learned about Autoencoders, their role in dimensionality reduction, elements like loss functions, and optimizers. Now, it's time to apply this knowledge and delve deeper into the fascinating world of optimizers.

In this lesson, we will train our Autoencoder using different optimizers and then compare their performance based on the reconstruction error. Our goal? To understand how different optimizers can impact the Autoencoder's ability to reconstruct its inputs.

Recalling from our previous lessons, optimizers in machine learning algorithms are used to update and adjust model parameters, reducing the errors. These errors are defined by loss functions, which estimate how well the model is performing its task. Some commonly used optimizers include Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Adam, RMSProp, and Adagrad. Although they all aim to minimize the loss function, they do so in different ways, leading to variations in performance. Understanding these differences enables us to choose the best optimizer for our machine learning tasks.

As a starting point, we need an Autoencoder, but before moving there let's load out digits dataset:

Next, we define a simple Autoencoder with a Dense input layer and a Dense output layer; both layers have the same dimensions: