We've covered the 'what' and 'how' of valuation. Now let's focus on the 'who' and 'when'. Choosing the right method and the right professional is crucial for a credible outcome. Let's practice making these critical judgments.
Engagement Message
What's one factor that determines who should perform a valuation?
Type
Sort Into Boxes
Practice Question
Match the valuation task to the professional who typically leads it.
Labels
- First Box Label: Investment Banker
- Second Box Label: Cert. Appraiser
First Box Items
- Company IPO
- M&A Deal
- Raising capital
- Strategic sale
Second Box Items
- Tax dispute
- Divorce case
- Estate settlement
- Shareholder dispute
Type
Swipe Left or Right
Practice Question
Which valuation driver is most central to each approach? Swipe left for Asset/Market drivers and right for Income drivers.
Labels
- Left Label: Asset / Market
- Right Label: Income
Left Label Items
- The liquidation value of machinery
- The recent sale price of a rival firm
- The current market value of real estate
- Public company trading multiples
Right Label Items
- Future cash generation potential
- Long-term subscription revenue streams
- The riskiness of future earnings
- Projected profitability over 5 years
Type
Multiple Choice
Practice Question
A court requires a 'defensible, objective' valuation for a shareholder dispute. Which professional is best suited for this?
A. The company's CEO B. An investment banker focused on deals C. A certified business appraiser D. A stock market analyst
Suggested Answers
- A
- B
- C - Correct
- D
Type
Fill In The Blanks
Markdown With Blanks
The process of using multiple valuation methods to arrive at a more confident value range is called [[blank:triangulation]].
It helps to [[blank:cross-check]] the results from different perspectives, such as comparing an asset-based value to a [[blank:market-based]] value.
Suggested Answers
- triangulation
- cross-check
- market-based
- estimation
- projection
Type
Multiple Choice
Practice Question
You are valuing a private, profitable software company with stable cash flows but no good public comparables. Which approach is the most logical starting point?
A. Asset-based, focusing on its computers and servers. B. Market-based, by using comps from a different industry. C. Income-based, by projecting its future cash flows. D. None, valuation is impossible without public comps.
Suggested Answers
- A
- B
- C - Correct
- D
