You can’t identify the best talent with an interview process built for the stone age
Coding exercises that don’t mimic real work leave you with a weak signal of actual skills.
Time-intensive interviews drain your engineers without guaranteeing better hires.
Generic tools miss critical insights into problem-solving approaches and collaboration skills.
One interview to reveal their full potential:
Live Coding Interviews
Evaluate candidates in a real-world coding environment that mirrors your team’s actual day-to-day challenges.
6 reasons you need a better solution for tech interviews
See how candidates really work
Uncover real problem-solving and collaboration skills by testing candidates in an environment that mimics the job.
Drive a consistent interview experience
Boost fairness and consistency with templates that ensure interviewers are asking the same questions and scoring on the same criteria.
Collaborate in real time
Work side by side with candidates in an interactive IDE to better understand their coding process and decision making.
Focus on skill, not resumes
Give every candidate the same fair shot by shifting attention to what they can actually do.
Give time back to your engineers
CodeSignal helps you maintain and refresh interview questions, freeing your engineers to spend more time building products.
Get rid of fragmented tools for good
Bring interviews, coding assessments, and collaboration into one seamless process.
Traditional Interviews vs. Live Coding Interviews
One was built for today. One peaked in 2015.
Compare |  Traditional Interviews |  Live Coding Interviews |
|---|---|---|
Skill evaluation | Relies on theoretical or generalized questions that may not reflect real-world job requirements. | Simulates real-world challenges with debugging tools, front-end previews, and interactive coding environments. |
Candidate experience | Limited structure, stressful, and time-consuming with unclear expectations. | Provides a collaborative, transparent, and job-relevant experience in a familiar IDE. |
Efficiency | Requires multiple rounds, manual evaluations, and repetitive assessments. | Streamlines the process with structured templates, immediate collaboration, and session playback so others on your team can review. |
Bias | Relies heavily on resumes and interviewer judgment, which can introduce unconscious bias. | Focuses on objective, skill-based evaluations, reducing bias and prioritizing candidate ability. |
Scalability | Difficult to scale due to the reliance on manual processes and scheduling inefficiencies. | Built to scale for high-volume hiring with integrated scheduling, automation, and role-specific interview tools.
|
A platform that expands your talent pool and validates the tech skills you need
Certified Assessments
Consistently identify qualified candidates for your roles with role-specific assessments.
Predictive Assessment Score
Measure candidates’ objective skills accurately with data-driven evaluations and assessment reports.
Live interview
Deliver the best candidate experience in a realistic coding environment, while accurately evaluating skill and fit.
Better hires start with Live Coding Interviews
Upgrade to a solution with an advanced IDE that simulates a realistic coding environment. Hire the best developers confidently.