In software design, understanding and addressing code smells, such as "Feature Envy," is vital for maintaining and improving code quality. Code smells are indicators of potential issues in your codebase that may hinder readability and maintainability. Feature Envy specifically arises when a method in a class has excessive interactions with the data of another class, often leading to a tangled code structure that is difficult to test and maintain.

Refactoring is the process of restructuring existing code to enhance its readability, maintainability, and performance without altering its external behavior. Common refactoring patterns, such as the Move Method, can be employed to address code smells like Feature Envy. This involves relocating methods to the class that holds the data they depend on, reducing unnecessary dependencies and improving cohesion.

In this course, we employ Test Driven Development (TDD) practices using Kotlin, the JUnit framework. Kotlin offers significant advantages with its modern syntax and language features, aiding in reducing runtime errors, while JUnit provides an efficient and comprehensive testing framework. We emphasize the TDD cycle — Red, Green, Refactor — to incrementally evolve the code with confidence, ensuring each step is supported by a comprehensive suite of tests.

In the upcoming practices, we'll focus on a GradeAnalyzer component that analyzes student grades. However, certain methods in the GradeAnalyzer class exhibit Feature Envy by deeply interacting with Student class data.

To successfully identify Feature Envy, focus on methods within a class that interact disproportionately with another class’s data. In our case, observe the function calculateFinalGrade() in GradeAnalyzer, which processes the grades owned by the Student class.

Here’s a glimpse of the current method:

Kotlin
Copy to clipboard
1class GradeAnalyzer(private val student: Student) {
2
3    fun calculateFinalGrade(): Double {
4        val grades = student.grades
5        if (grades.isEmpty()) return 0.0
6
7        var totalEarned = 0.0
8        var totalPossible = 0.0
9
10        for (grade in grades) {
11            totalEarned += if (isLateSubmission(grade)) {
12                grade.score * 0.9 // 10% penalty for late submissions
13            } else {
14                grade.score
15            }
16            totalPossible += grade.totalPoints
17        }
18
19        return (totalEarned / totalPossible) * 100
20    }
21
22    // Assume method implementation
23    private fun isLateSubmission(grade: Grade): Boolean {
24        // Logic to determine late submission
25        return false
26    }
27}

Since calculateFinalGrade() relies on Student data, any changes to Student’s data structure might require updates to calculateFinalGrade(), creating a tight dependency. calculateFinalGrade() frequently accesses student.grades and operates on each grade item’s data, suggesting that it may be better suited to the Student class. Additionally, testing for calculateFinalGrade() may require a Student instance with specific data, complicating the testing process. It can also result in reduced readability. When a method interacts heavily with another class’s data, understanding which class owns the data becomes confusing.

When we refactor how grades are scored, the calculateFinalGrade() method can focus only on the logic it cares about: aggregating grades for a final grade.

Kotlin
Copy to clipboard
1class GradeAnalyzer(private val grades: List<Grade>) {
2
3    fun calculateFinalGrade(): Double {
4        if (grades.isEmpty()) return 0.0
5
6        var totalEarned = 0.0
7        var totalPossible = 0.0
8
9        for (grade in grades) {
10            totalEarned += grade.getScoreWithLatePenalty()
11            totalPossible += grade.totalPoints
12        }
13
14        return (totalEarned / totalPossible) * 100
15    }
16}

In this lesson, we addressed Feature Envy using the Move Method refactoring technique. By identifying methods that are overly interested in another class’s data and relocating them appropriately, you experienced improved code organization and cohesion.

Key takeaway: Feature Envy poses challenges in maintainability; refactoring via TDD — Red, Green, Refactor — enables a more robust codebase using Kotlin, and JUnit.

Please venture into the upcoming practice exercises to consolidate your understanding of these concepts in different scenarios. Remember, the path to cleaner code involves continuous, mindful improvement. Keep practicing, and congratulations on progressing to this stage of mastering TDD in Kotlin with JUnit!